Tulip mania 1637 online dating
A false description of a person's appearance will also give a false description of their character; a careless touch of this nature will considerably mislead the reader.William III has frequently been so wrongly described; the author has read of him as "broken-nosed," "hunchbacked," with "a mouth indicated by a thin line," as of "a mean exterior," etc.The account of the medals is taken from Bizot's Medalische historie der Republiek Van Holland (1690).Many of these are printed and described in the Life of William III (London, 1703). Thomassen Thuessink Van der Hoop (The Hague, 1923).
Le Grand lecteur et Louis XIV, George Pags (Paris, 1905), is a laborious work with a copious bibliography; this careful writer judges the masterpiece of Otto Klopp—Der Fall der Hauses Stuart—"confuse, partiale, suspecte," and considers that Johan de Witt, by M.
Gourville's character was tainted, and Groen Van Prinsterer thought his evidence valueless.
De Pomponne's Mmoires (Paris, 1860) cover the ground between 1671-1679.
The Marquis de Saint Maurice was the envoy of the Duke of Savoy at Versailles and accompanied Louis XIV in the campaigns of 1672-1673, of which he has left a lively account.
The vivid and touching Lettres et Mmoires de Marie, Reine d'Angleterre (The Hague, 1880), are of the first importance, and there is an interesting collection of Mary II's earlier letters in Letters of Two Queens, by B.
William Henry, by the Grace of God Prince of Orange, Count of Nassau, of Vianden, of Buren, of Leerdam and Meurs, Baron of Breda, Marquis of Ter Veere and Vlissingen, etc., etc., Knight of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, Stadtholder of Holland, Zeeland, West Friesland, Utrecht, Overyssel, and Gelderland, Captain and Admiral-General of Their High Mightinesses the States General of the Netherlands (der Unie), afterwards King of England, Scotland, France and Ireland. We may claim stupendous discoveries in science, but this is not a virtue; nor have these same discoveries been always turned to virtuous ends; we can claim a wide religious tolerance (probably our one achievement), but it is doubtful if this is not indifference, and that we are not persecutors merely because we are apathetic on questions of dogma; it must also be admitted that tolerance has always been an attitude of fine minds and is no modern discovery, and that the temper of the bigot and the fervour of the fanatic are by no means extinct.